Texas A&M
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
107  Karis Jochen SR 20:03
656  Kelsie Warren FR 21:09
673  Ashley Driscoll FR 21:10
794  Devin Norton JR 21:18
848  Haley Deakins SR 21:22
858  Katie Watson SR 21:23
1,015  Arin Rice JR 21:32
1,064  Kelsey Persyn JR 21:36
1,155  Laura Craig SR 21:42
1,268  Lauryn Barrientos FR 21:49
1,589  Ashton Hutcherson FR 22:08
National Rank #88 of 344
South Central Region Rank #6 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 6.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Karis Jochen Kelsie Warren Ashley Driscoll Devin Norton Haley Deakins Katie Watson Arin Rice Kelsey Persyn Laura Craig Lauryn Barrientos Ashton Hutcherson
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 935 19:35 20:55 21:16 21:35 21:11 21:45 21:25 21:36 21:37 22:41
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 1012 20:01 21:12 21:28 21:16 21:16 21:33 21:32
Aggieland Open 10/07 1202 20:58 21:33
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational (B Race) 10/14 1023 20:13 21:10 21:05 21:24 21:20 21:14 21:39 21:43 21:45
SEC Championship 10/28 1000 20:06 20:51 21:39 21:13 21:32 21:34 22:46 22:21 21:45 22:06 22:10
South Central Region Championships 11/11 1099 20:43 21:38 21:01 21:11 21:14 21:38 22:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 6.1 185 0.1 0.5 5.7 75.1 16.7 2.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karis Jochen 65.6% 86.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karis Jochen 8.9 1.1 3.1 5.0 6.2 6.9 7.2 6.9 8.0 6.7 6.0 5.7 5.7 5.8 4.1 4.3 4.0 3.0 2.7 2.5 1.1 1.5 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.3
Kelsie Warren 41.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.1
Ashley Driscoll 42.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8
Devin Norton 47.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3
Haley Deakins 49.9 0.1 0.1
Katie Watson 50.8 0.1 0.1 0.1
Arin Rice 56.8 0.1 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 0.5% 0.5 4
5 5.7% 5.7 5
6 75.1% 75.1 6
7 16.7% 16.7 7
8 2.1% 2.1 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0